SRS vs Supersonic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSSupersonic
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 2,288
First released20252022
ReplacesPlexamp, Spotify desktop

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Supersonic if…

  • Fast and lightweight
  • Active development
Supersonic details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Supersonic better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Supersonic is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and Supersonic free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Supersonic under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Supersonic with Docker?

SRS: yes. Supersonic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons