SRS vs Sublime Music

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSSublime Music
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Python
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 112
First released20252019
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Sublime Music if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Sublime Music details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Sublime Music better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Sublime Music is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and Sublime Music free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Sublime Music under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Sublime Music with Docker?

SRS: yes. Sublime Music: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons