SRS vs Stash

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSStash
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 12,802
First released20252019
ReplacesPlex

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Stash if…

  • Powerful organization
  • Extensible via plugins
  • Easy to deploy
Stash details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Stash better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Stash is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and Stash free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Stash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Stash with Docker?

SRS: yes. Stash: yes.

Related comparisons