SHSelfHostIndex

Solidtime vs Gnomecast Timewarrior UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SO Solidtime Modern open-source time tracker for teams VS GN Gnomecast Timewarrior UI Graphical front-end for the Timewarrior CLI tracker
FeatureSolidtimeGnomecast Timewarrior UI
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePHPPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 8,846★ 70
First released20242020
ReplacesToggl, Clockify, HarvestToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Solidtime if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in PHP
Solidtime details

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is Solidtime or Gnomecast Timewarrior UI better?

Neither is universally better. Solidtime has the larger community, while Gnomecast Timewarrior UI is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Solidtime and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI free and open-source?

Yes. Solidtime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Solidtime and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI with Docker?

Solidtime: yes. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons