SnapRAID vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
SnapRAID
Parity-based backup for disk arrays of large files
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | SnapRAID | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,543 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2011 | 2024 |
| Replaces | unRAID parity | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose SnapRAID if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is SnapRAID or pgBackWeb better?
pgBackWeb is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SnapRAID if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are SnapRAID and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. SnapRAID is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run SnapRAID and pgBackWeb with Docker?
SnapRAID: check the project docs for container support. pgBackWeb: yes.