smartctl Exporter vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuresmartctl ExporterUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 573★ 89,960
First released20222021
ReplacesCrystalDiskInfoPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose smartctl Exporter if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
smartctl Exporter details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is smartctl Exporter or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider smartctl Exporter if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are smartctl Exporter and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. smartctl Exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run smartctl Exporter and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

smartctl Exporter: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons