Titra vs FocusTime Tracker
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Titra
Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams
VS
FocusTime Tracker
Minimal command-line and web work timer
| Feature | Titra | FocusTime Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 496 | ★ 2,535 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest, Clockify | Toggl, Harvest |
Why pick each one
Choose Titra if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Choose FocusTime Tracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Titra or FocusTime Tracker better?
Neither is universally better. FocusTime Tracker has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Titra and FocusTime Tracker free and open-source?
Yes. Titra is licensed under MIT and FocusTime Tracker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Titra and FocusTime Tracker with Docker?
Titra: yes. FocusTime Tracker: check the project docs for container support.