One-Time Secret vs Yopass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
One-Time Secret
Share sensitive credentials with self-destructing links
VS
Yopass
Securely share secrets with encrypted one-time links
| Feature | One-Time Secret | Yopass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,894 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2012 | 2016 |
| Replaces | 1Password, Doppler | 1Password, Doppler |
Why pick each one
Choose One-Time Secret if…
- Great for one-off credential sharing
- Easy to self-host
Frequently asked questions
Is One-Time Secret or Yopass better?
Neither is universally better. Yopass has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are One-Time Secret and Yopass free and open-source?
Yes. One-Time Secret is licensed under MIT and Yopass under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run One-Time Secret and Yopass with Docker?
One-Time Secret: yes. Yopass: yes.