Bitwarden vs Yopass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bitwarden
Open-source password manager you can self-host
VS
Yopass
Securely share secrets with encrypted one-time links
| Feature | Bitwarden | Yopass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C# | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,782 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2016 | 2016 |
| Replaces | 1Password, LastPass, Dashlane | 1Password, Doppler |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Bitwarden or Yopass better?
Neither is universally better. Bitwarden has the larger community, while Yopass is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Bitwarden and Yopass free and open-source?
Yes. Bitwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Yopass under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bitwarden and Yopass with Docker?
Bitwarden: yes. Yopass: yes.