SeaweedFS vs elFinder

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSelFinder
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 4,800
First released20152010
ReplacesAmazon S3Google Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose elFinder if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
elFinder details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or elFinder better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while elFinder is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and elFinder free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and elFinder with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons