SeaweedFS vs Syncthing-Fork

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSSyncthing-Fork
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 2,534
First released20152017
ReplacesAmazon S3Dropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Syncthing-Fork if…

  • Actively maintained
  • No central server needed
Syncthing-Fork details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Syncthing-Fork better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Syncthing-Fork is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and Syncthing-Fork free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Syncthing-Fork under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Syncthing-Fork with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Syncthing-Fork: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons