SeaweedFS vs SFTPGo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSSFTPGo
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 12,371
First released20152019
ReplacesAmazon S3Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose SFTPGo if…

  • Multi-protocol in one binary
  • Flexible storage backends
  • Strong access controls
SFTPGo details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or SFTPGo better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while SFTPGo is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and SFTPGo free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SFTPGo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and SFTPGo with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. SFTPGo: yes.

Related comparisons