Rustic vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rustic
Fast encrypted deduplicated backup compatible with Restic
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | Rustic | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,170 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2022 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose Rustic if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Rustic or pgBackWeb better?
Neither is universally better. Rustic has the larger community, while pgBackWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Rustic and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. Rustic is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rustic and pgBackWeb with Docker?
Rustic: check the project docs for container support. pgBackWeb: yes.