RustDesk Server vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureRustDesk ServerWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 10,209★ 26,595
First released20212021
ReplacesTeamViewerOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose RustDesk Server if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
RustDesk Server details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is RustDesk Server or WG-Easy better?

Neither is universally better. WG-Easy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are RustDesk Server and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. RustDesk Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run RustDesk Server and WG-Easy with Docker?

RustDesk Server: yes. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons