Rubywarden vs Yopass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rubywarden
Experimental Ruby implementation of the Bitwarden API
VS
Yopass
Securely share secrets with encrypted one-time links
| Feature | Rubywarden | Yopass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 589 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2017 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Bitwarden, 1Password | 1Password, Doppler |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Rubywarden or Yopass better?
Yopass is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Rubywarden if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Rubywarden and Yopass free and open-source?
Yes. Rubywarden is licensed under MIT and Yopass under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rubywarden and Yopass with Docker?
Rubywarden: check the project docs for container support. Yopass: yes.