Yarrharr vs yarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Yarrharr
Self-hosted feed reader with a mobile-friendly interface
VS
yarr
Yet another RSS reader as a single binary
| Feature | Yarrharr | yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3 | ★ 3,919 |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose Yarrharr if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Yarrharr or yarr better?
yarr is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Yarrharr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Yarrharr and yarr free and open-source?
Yes. Yarrharr is licensed under GPL-3.0 and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Yarrharr and yarr with Docker?
Yarrharr: yes. yarr: yes.