Liferea vs Yarrharr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Liferea
Linux Feed Reader for the GNOME desktop
VS
Yarrharr
Self-hosted feed reader with a mobile-friendly interface
| Feature | Liferea | Yarrharr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 912 | ★ 3 |
| First released | 2003 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose Liferea if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Yarrharr if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Liferea or Yarrharr better?
Liferea is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Yarrharr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Liferea and Yarrharr free and open-source?
Yes. Liferea is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Yarrharr under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Liferea and Yarrharr with Docker?
Liferea: check the project docs for container support. Yarrharr: yes.