Liferea vs FeedHQ
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Liferea
Linux Feed Reader for the GNOME desktop
VS
FeedHQ
Web-based feed reader with Google Reader API support
| Feature | Liferea | FeedHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 912 | ★ 579 |
| First released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Google Reader, Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Liferea if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose FeedHQ if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Liferea or FeedHQ better?
Liferea is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FeedHQ if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Liferea and FeedHQ free and open-source?
Yes. Liferea is licensed under GPL-2.0 and FeedHQ under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Liferea and FeedHQ with Docker?
Liferea: check the project docs for container support. FeedHQ: yes.