Feed dashboard nono Reader-self vs Yarrharr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeed dashboard nono Reader-selfYarrharr
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score5 · At risk69 · Good
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, dockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 153★ 3
First released20132014
ReplacesGoogle Reader, FeedlyFeedly, Google Reader

What are Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Yarrharr?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self

Reader Self is a self-hosted RSS and Atom feed aggregator written in PHP with a responsive interface. It exposes a Google Reader compatible API for use with mobile applications.

  • Google Reader API support
  • Responsive interface
  • Works with mobile clients

Yarrharr

Yarrharr is a self-hosted RSS and Atom feed reader written in Python and Django. It offers a clean, mobile-friendly interface for reading feeds organized into labels.

  • Mobile-friendly reading
  • Label-based organization
  • Django-based backend

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self vs Yarrharr: key differences

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is written in PHP, while Yarrharr is built with Python. Licensing differs — MIT for Feed dashboard nono Reader-self versus GPL-3.0 for Yarrharr. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Yarrharr. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self has the considerably larger community, at 153 GitHub stars versus 3.

Why pick each one

Choose Feed dashboard nono Reader-self if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
Feed dashboard nono Reader-self details

Choose Yarrharr if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Yarrharr details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feed dashboard nono Reader-self or Yarrharr better?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Yarrharr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Yarrharr free and open-source?

Yes. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is licensed under MIT and Yarrharr under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Yarrharr with Docker?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self: yes. Yarrharr: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Feed dashboard nono Reader-self or Yarrharr?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Yarrharr. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons