Restic vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureResticSeaweedFS
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,412★ 33,952
First released20152015
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Restic or SeaweedFS better?

Restic is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider SeaweedFS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Restic and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Restic is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Restic and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Restic: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons