Restic vs Restic REST Server

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureResticRestic REST Server
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseBSD-2-Clause
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,412★ 1,470
First released20152016
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteBackblaze B2

Why pick each one

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Choose Restic REST Server if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Restic REST Server details

Frequently asked questions

Is Restic or Restic REST Server better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community, while Restic REST Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Restic and Restic REST Server free and open-source?

Yes. Restic is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Restic REST Server under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Restic and Restic REST Server with Docker?

Restic: yes. Restic REST Server: yes.

Related comparisons