Restic Mailer vs Rustic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureRestic MailerRustic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageShellRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 661★ 3,170
First released20182022
ReplacesBackblazeBackblaze, CrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Restic Mailer if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
Restic Mailer details

Choose Rustic if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Rustic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Restic Mailer or Rustic better?

Neither is universally better. Rustic has the larger community, while Restic Mailer is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Restic Mailer and Rustic free and open-source?

Yes. Restic Mailer is licensed under MIT and Rustic under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Restic Mailer and Rustic with Docker?

Restic Mailer: yes. Rustic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons