Reiverr vs Stash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Stash
Self-hosted media organizer and server
| Feature | Reiverr | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 49 · Fair | 92 · Excellent |
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,347 | ★ 13,007 |
| First released | 2023 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Plex | Plex |
What are Reiverr and Stash?
Reiverr
Reiverr is a clean, unified interface for Jellyfin combined with Radarr and Sonarr that lets you browse, request, and stream content from one place. It brings discovery and playback together in a single modern web app.
- Unified Jellyfin and *arr interface
- Browse and request content
- Streaming playback
- Modern design
Stash
Stash is a self-hosted media organizer that catalogs video and image collections with rich metadata, tagging, and scraping. It targets users who want a deeply organized personal media archive. It is deployed via Docker or a single binary.
- Rich metadata and tagging
- Scraper and plugin system
- Built-in web player
- SQLite-backed storage
Reiverr vs Stash: key differences
Reiverr is written in TypeScript, while Stash is built with Go. Licensing differs — MIT for Reiverr versus AGPL-3.0 for Stash. Stash is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Reiverr. Stash is the more established project (first released 2019), while Reiverr arrived in 2023. Stash has the considerably larger community, at 13,007 GitHub stars versus 2,347.
Why pick each one
Choose Reiverr if…
- Single pane for media
- Clean modern UI
Watch out for
- Requires Jellyfin and *arr stack
- Younger project
Choose Stash if…
- Powerful organization
- Extensible via plugins
- Easy to deploy
Watch out for
- Single-user focused
- Niche feature set
Frequently asked questions
Is Reiverr or Stash better?
Stash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Reiverr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Reiverr and Stash free and open-source?
Yes. Reiverr is licensed under MIT and Stash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Reiverr and Stash with Docker?
Reiverr: yes. Stash: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Reiverr or Stash?
Stash has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Reiverr. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.