RediSearch vs ZincSearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RediSearch
Full-text and vector search module for Redis
VS
ZincSearch
Lightweight search engine alternative to Elasticsearch
| Feature | RediSearch | ZincSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | RSALv2 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,205 | ★ 17,884 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Elasticsearch, Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is RediSearch or ZincSearch better?
ZincSearch is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider RediSearch if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are RediSearch and ZincSearch free and open-source?
Yes. RediSearch is licensed under RSALv2 and ZincSearch under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RediSearch and ZincSearch with Docker?
RediSearch: yes. ZincSearch: yes.