Blast vs ZincSearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Blast
Distributed full-text search server in Go
VS
ZincSearch
Lightweight search engine alternative to Elasticsearch
| Feature | Blast | ZincSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,074 | ★ 17,884 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch | Elasticsearch, Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose Blast if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Blast or ZincSearch better?
ZincSearch is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Blast if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Blast and ZincSearch free and open-source?
Yes. Blast is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ZincSearch under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Blast and ZincSearch with Docker?
Blast: yes. ZincSearch: yes.