Readeck vs Wallabag
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Readeck
Save and read web content in a personal library
VS
Wallabag
Self-hosted read-it-later application
| Feature | Readeck | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,100 | ★ 12,884 |
| First released | 2023 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Instapaper | Pocket, Instapaper |
Why pick each one
Choose Wallabag if…
- Great read-it-later experience
- Own your reading list
- Apps available
Frequently asked questions
Is Readeck or Wallabag better?
Neither is universally better. Wallabag has the larger community, while Readeck is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Readeck and Wallabag free and open-source?
Yes. Readeck is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wallabag under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Readeck and Wallabag with Docker?
Readeck: yes. Wallabag: yes.