Rclone vs Yuno Archive
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rclone
Sync and copy files to dozens of cloud providers
VS
Yuno Archive
Extend functionnality of built-in yunoHost backup system
| Feature | Rclone | Yuno Archive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Language | Go | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 58,995 | ★ 6 |
| First released | 2014 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Backblaze | archivist, borg |
Why pick each one
Choose Yuno Archive if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Shell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Rclone or Yuno Archive better?
Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community, while Yuno Archive is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Rclone and Yuno Archive free and open-source?
Yes. Rclone is licensed under MIT and Yuno Archive under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rclone and Yuno Archive with Docker?
Rclone: yes. Yuno Archive: check the project docs for container support.