Rclone vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rclone
Sync and copy files to dozens of cloud providers
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | Rclone | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 58,995 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Backblaze | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Rclone or pgBackWeb better?
Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community, while pgBackWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Rclone and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. Rclone is licensed under MIT and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rclone and pgBackWeb with Docker?
Rclone: yes. pgBackWeb: yes.