Rclone vs Sosse
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rclone
Sync and copy files to dozens of cloud providers
VS
Sosse
Selenium based search engine and crawler with offline archiving
| Feature | Rclone | Sosse |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 58,995 | ★ 2 |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Backblaze | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Sosse if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Rclone or Sosse better?
Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Rclone and Sosse free and open-source?
Yes. Rclone is licensed under MIT and Sosse under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rclone and Sosse with Docker?
Rclone: yes. Sosse: yes.