Rclone vs SnapRAID
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rclone
Sync and copy files to dozens of cloud providers
VS
SnapRAID
Parity-based backup for disk arrays of large files
| Feature | Rclone | SnapRAID |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 58,995 | ★ 2,543 |
| First released | 2014 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Backblaze | unRAID parity |
Why pick each one
Choose SnapRAID if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Rclone or SnapRAID better?
Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Rclone and SnapRAID free and open-source?
Yes. Rclone is licensed under MIT and SnapRAID under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rclone and SnapRAID with Docker?
Rclone: yes. SnapRAID: check the project docs for container support.