RcloneView vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureRcloneViewSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,941★ 87,439
First released20172014
ReplacesMountain Duck, CyberduckDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose RcloneView if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
RcloneView details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is RcloneView or Syncthing better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are RcloneView and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. RcloneView is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run RcloneView and Syncthing with Docker?

RcloneView: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons