File Browser vs RcloneView

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserRcloneView
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 2,941
First released20172017
ReplacesDropboxMountain Duck, Cyberduck

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose RcloneView if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
RcloneView details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or RcloneView better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and RcloneView free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and RcloneView under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and RcloneView with Docker?

File Browser: yes. RcloneView: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons