qrcp vs SFTPGo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
qrcp
Transfer files to and from phones by scanning a QR code
VS
SFTPGo
Full-featured SFTP, FTP and WebDAV server
| Feature | qrcp | SFTPGo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,491 | ★ 12,371 |
| First released | 2018 | 2019 |
| Replaces | AirDrop, Snapdrop | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose SFTPGo if…
- Multi-protocol in one binary
- Flexible storage backends
- Strong access controls
Frequently asked questions
Is qrcp or SFTPGo better?
Neither is universally better. SFTPGo has the larger community, while qrcp is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are qrcp and SFTPGo free and open-source?
Yes. qrcp is licensed under MIT and SFTPGo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run qrcp and SFTPGo with Docker?
qrcp: check the project docs for container support. SFTPGo: yes.