Grafana Pyroscope vs Uptime Kuma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Grafana Pyroscope
Continuous profiling for finding performance bottlenecks
VS
Uptime Kuma
Easy self-hosted uptime monitoring tool
| Feature | Grafana Pyroscope | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,618 | ★ 89,960 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Datadog Profiler | Pingdom, UptimeRobot |
Why pick each one
Choose Grafana Pyroscope if…
- Pinpoints performance hotspots
- Scales efficiently
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana Pyroscope or Uptime Kuma better?
Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Grafana Pyroscope if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Grafana Pyroscope and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?
Yes. Grafana Pyroscope is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grafana Pyroscope and Uptime Kuma with Docker?
Grafana Pyroscope: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.