Puter vs Zipline

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterZipline
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 3,313
First released20262021
ReplacesImgur, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Zipline if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Zipline details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Zipline better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Zipline free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Zipline under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Zipline with Docker?

Puter: yes. Zipline: yes.

Related comparisons