Puter vs elFinder

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterelFinder
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 4,800
First released20262010
ReplacesGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose elFinder if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
elFinder details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or elFinder better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and elFinder free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and elFinder with Docker?

Puter: yes. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons