Puter vs Updog

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterUpdog
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB32 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 3,386
First released20262019
ReplacesWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Updog if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Updog details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Updog better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Updog is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Puter and Updog free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Updog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Updog with Docker?

Puter: yes. Updog: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons