Puter vs Pydio Cells Client

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterPydio Cells Client
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 32
First released20262019
ReplacesDropbox, Box

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Pydio Cells Client if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Pydio Cells Client details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Pydio Cells Client better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Pydio Cells Client free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pydio Cells Client under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Pydio Cells Client with Docker?

Puter: yes. Pydio Cells Client: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons