Puter vs Syncany

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterSyncany
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 1,641
First released20262011
ReplacesDropbox, SpiderOak

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Syncany if…

  • Works with any storage provider
  • Strong encryption design
Syncany details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Syncany better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Syncany free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Syncany under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Syncany with Docker?

Puter: yes. Syncany: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons