Puter vs SparkleShare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterSparkleShare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC#
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 4,971
First released20262010
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose SparkleShare if…

  • Full history of every change
  • Works over plain SSH
SparkleShare details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or SparkleShare better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and SparkleShare free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and SparkleShare with Docker?

Puter: yes. SparkleShare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons