Puter vs Sharry

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterSharry
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptElm
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 1,338
First released20262025
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Sharry if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Elm
Sharry details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Sharry better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Sharry free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sharry under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Sharry with Docker?

Puter: yes. Sharry: yes.

Related comparisons