Puter vs Send

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterSend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 5,847
First released20262020
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Send if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Send details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Send better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Send free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Send under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Send with Docker?

Puter: yes. Send: yes.

Related comparisons