Puter vs Seafile

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterSeafile
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 15,077
First released20262012
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Seafile if…

  • Excellent sync performance
  • Stable and battle-tested
  • Good for large libraries
Seafile details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Seafile better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Seafile free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Seafile with Docker?

Puter: yes. Seafile: yes.

Related comparisons