Puter vs Samba

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterSamba
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 43,003
First released20262020
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Samba if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Samba details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Samba better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Samba free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Samba under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Samba with Docker?

Puter: yes. Samba: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons