Puter vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterRestic
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 35,412
First released20262015
ReplacesBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Puter and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Restic with Docker?

Puter: yes. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons