PsiTransfer vs Filebin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
PsiTransfer
Simple open-source file sharing solution
VS
Filebin
Quick file sharing with auto-expiring bins
| Feature | PsiTransfer | Filebin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,920 | ★ 274 |
| First released | 2017 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose PsiTransfer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Choose Filebin if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is PsiTransfer or Filebin better?
Neither is universally better. PsiTransfer has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are PsiTransfer and Filebin free and open-source?
Yes. PsiTransfer is licensed under MIT and Filebin under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run PsiTransfer and Filebin with Docker?
PsiTransfer: yes. Filebin: yes.