Filebin vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilebinSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMPL-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 274★ 87,439
First released20142014
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Filebin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
Filebin details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Filebin or Syncthing better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Filebin and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Filebin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Filebin and Syncthing with Docker?

Filebin: yes. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons