Filebin vs rustypaste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filebin
Quick file sharing with auto-expiring bins
VS
rustypaste
Minimal file upload and pastebin service
| Feature | Filebin | rustypaste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 274 | ★ 1,192 |
| First released | 2014 | 2021 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Firefox Send | WeTransfer, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Filebin if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Choose rustypaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Filebin or rustypaste better?
Neither is universally better. rustypaste has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Filebin and rustypaste free and open-source?
Yes. Filebin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and rustypaste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filebin and rustypaste with Docker?
Filebin: yes. rustypaste: yes.