Proxmox VE Exporter vs Uptime Kuma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Proxmox VE Exporter
Prometheus exporter for Proxmox Virtual Environment
VS
Uptime Kuma
Easy self-hosted uptime monitoring tool
| Feature | Proxmox VE Exporter | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,429 | ★ 89,960 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | vRealize Operations | Pingdom, UptimeRobot |
Why pick each one
Choose Proxmox VE Exporter if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Proxmox VE Exporter or Uptime Kuma better?
Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Proxmox VE Exporter if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Proxmox VE Exporter and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?
Yes. Proxmox VE Exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Proxmox VE Exporter and Uptime Kuma with Docker?
Proxmox VE Exporter: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.