Davros vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDavrosSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 301★ 33,952
First released20142015
ReplacesDropboxAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Davros if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Davros details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Davros or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Davros is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Davros and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Davros is licensed under MIT and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Davros and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Davros: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons